To explain the problem, I need to first elucidate the ingredients for love and the meaningful interactions.The basic ingredients for love As demonstrated by studies on interpersonal attraction, creating and maintaining love involves validating communications between the partners on a variety of issues, including understanding and concern for the partner's personal and emotional needs, developing companionship, physical attractiveness, cultivating and nurturing physical, emotional, intellectual and spiritual well beings, respecting, supporting, forgiving, accepting and encouraging, expressions of appreciation and affection: sexual pleasure and fidelity, commitment, shared activities, as well as the absence of controlling, defensiveness, contempt, stonewalling, and blaming, among other factors.I argue that, however, although the internet has helped few find romantic relationships and marriages, the research has overlooked various defects and problems associated with this type of "contact." I will examine a couple of them.The research findings can be summarized as followings: 1.
It should fall to, or slightly above, the knee, and not be too sparkly or low-cut. Make sure patterns are kept to a minimum and shoes are shined.Online daters tend to fill in the information gaps with positive qualities in a potential partner; on the other hand, everyone wants to make the self appear as attractive as possible to potential dates by exaggerating the self desirable traits. There are gender differences in both preference and messaging behavior on online dating sites.Women weigh income more than physical characteristics, and men sought physical attractiveness and offered status-related information more than women. The service users preferred similarity on a variety of (mainly demographic) categories (including child preferences, education, and physical features like height, age, race, religion, political views, and smoking).Instead, opt for silk pants, dress pants, or a skirt.Pair with a patent leather flat, or one with nice embellishments such as a bow, buckle, or a print.The guys are all hot, though—like, hot—so that’s nice. He kind of has the same nose and eyes as the version of me in the first photo, but his forehead is smaller than the forehead of the version of me who was on that boat. I have a big beer gut and, inexplicably, I am five-four at most. He sort of looks like me, but only the version of me from photo No. This me maybe could be a relative of the preceding guys but, like, a second cousin at best. It would be really nice if this were the version of myself I resembled most in real life. The photo appears to have been generated by running all of the previous photos through one of those apps that mashes faces together. He is receiving a diploma in this photo and his nose, jaw, hairline, eye shape, and cheekbones are all new. It is accurate to say that the research findings showed some behavior and attitudes of the online daters who joined the internet community with different motivations, expectations and backgrounds, but it is inaccurate to assume the behavior and attitudes reflect real interpersonal attractions.This is because the online dating/matching (as provided by the commercial websites) lacks the basic ingredients for developing real love.To accomplish the above tasks, the partners need to engage in the meaningful interactions (face-to-face interactions, including both verbal and nonverbal communications), which allow one person to give to and receive from the other.(Although online daters may be able to exchange messages after they pass each other's initial screening on the basis of evaluating the category-based information, the process is the opposite of the interaction-based attraction).